Tuesday, 3 December 2013

Aggressive kids born of poor parenting




The picture for representational purpose only.
 
 Kozhikode: Poor parenting and changes in lifestyle brought about by  the new socio-economic realities are also to blame for the increasing aggressiveness displayed by children and their use of abusive language today, believes noted psychiatrist, Dr S. Santhakumar.
 
“Changes in the socio-economic profile of the st­ate during the past three or four decades have to be taken into account while addressing the issue,” he says.
 
While agreeing that the language used by the new generation cinema and  on television has a big  influence on  children who are at an impressionable age and scores of studies have established the negative influence of television on them, he says this alone  cannot be blamed  for the foul language used by many of them today.
 
“We have to look at the larger picture as in most families parents don’t have enough time for their children as they are both working. They may think that by working hard to make  a living they are providing for their children’s future,  but unfortunately it is not so simple. Children have their own fantasies and desires and if parents are unable to devote more time to listening to them,  they  will try to fulfill them through other sources,” he warns.
 
“This is especially important in the age of the Internet and mobile phones. I am not saying parents should spy on their children, but they should have a clear understanding about the kind of networking they have, “ he underlines.
 
Although in most cases  children can be cured of aggressive behavior if the problem is addressed, in  some cases they are beyond help, he says. “ I feel sad for such children and their parents,” he adds. 

Irfan Pathan all set to become first Indian cricketer to have personal physio

Left arm seamer Irfan Pathan, out of international cricket action for last few months due to a hip injury, is all set to do something never done by any Indian cricketer before.

"Yes, I am going to hire a full-time personal physio very soon. I have lost quite a lot of playing years due to injury. I made a few comeback, in and out of team. I hope this is my last injury break," Irfan told Headlines Today in an exclusive interview late last night.  

Irfan is not the only cricketer whose career has been affected by injuries. Quite a few Indian cricketers specially seamers and medium pace bowlers like Ashish Nehra's career have been marred by injuries.

"Off course, having a personal physio will help me stay fit and strong. I know I will be the first cricketer to do so," observed Irfan.

He was all praise for his fellow teammates. "Bhuvaneshwar has been playing brilliantly and others are also chipping in. It's quite a balanced side. I think it will be great contest. I hope and pray that India emerge victorious. This team is world beater and on any given day beat any team".

"Just look at the batting line up. It's the best in the world. Rohit and Shikhar are brilliant upfront. With Virat, Yuvraj, Raina and Dhoni, this team bats quite deep," he said.

Positive parenting won't make up for yelling, insulting





Young adults who had been criticized, insulted or threatened by a parent growing up were more likely to be anxious or depressed, in a new study.
Even when the same or another parent expressed plenty of affection, researchers found the apparent harmful effects of having a verbally aggressive mother or father persisted.
"There's a fair amount of data out there that says that parental verbal aggression toward a kid is very damaging," Byron R. Egeland said.
"In many instances, people find it to be as damaging as actual physical abuse," he told Reuters Health.
Egeland has studied child maltreatment and development at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and was not involved in the new research.
Past research has linked verbally aggressive parenting to changes in children's brain development and to personality disorders later in life, researchers led by Ann Polcari write in the journal Child Abuse & Neglect.
Polcari, from Northeastern University in Boston, and her colleagues wanted to see whether also receiving affection from parents would lessen those impacts.
Their study included about 2,500 young people, ages 18 to 25. They each took a series of online surveys as part of being screened for in-person tests and interviews for other research.
Participants reported both on their current mental health and wellbeing and on their experiences with their parents growing up.
They rated each of their parent's verbal aggression on a scale from zero to 105, based on how often mothers or fathers yelled at, scolded, insulted and blamed them as kids. More verbally aggressive parents got higher scores.
Study participants gave their mother's verbal aggression an average score of 22. They scored fathers between 26 and 29.
Verbal affection was measured from zero to 84, with higher scores reflecting a parent who expressed more affection and engaged in more meaningful conversations with the child.
Participants scored their mothers between 65 and 66 on that scale, on average, and their fathers between 54 and 55.
Young adults tended to have more psychiatric symptoms like anxiety and depression when either their mother or their father was verbally aggressive.
What's more, although having a verbally affectionate parent seemed to have a positive impact on young people's wellbeing, it didn't make up for having a second parent who was verbally aggressive, Polcari's team found.
And having one parent who was both affectionate and aggressive wasn't any better for a young person's psychiatric health than if that parent was only aggressive.
"It isn't as if one cancels the other," Timothy Moore, from York University in Toronto, told Reuters Health.
"Whatever the benefits of positive expressions may be, the negative association between verbal aggression and adjustment persisted," Moore said. He has studied the effects of verbal aggression in childhood but wasn't involved in the new study.
"It certainly is important that there be somebody there that the kid can count on, starting at an early age," Egeland said.
"But a large amount of verbal abuse or for that matter having a parent who is emotionally unavailable or physically abuses the kid - those kids will grow up with the idea that they can't count on others. Those are kids that oftentimes don't benefit from the support of a neighbor or coach or relative," he said.
"If the abuse starts at a very early age, it's likely that kid is not going to have trust in much of anybody."
Egeland said the fact that verbal aggression is more common in poor families means children who experience it are also more likely to have single parents and lower quality schools - compounding their risks.
One limitation of the study, the researchers noted, is that participants recalled their parents' verbal aggression from years earlier to the best of their memories. They also reported their own symptoms and weren't checked by a doctor for psychiatric illness.

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Pranab makes way for Modi's rally in Patna, to cut short his Bihar trip

Pranab makes way for Modi's rally in Patna, to cut short his Bihar trip

Narendra Modi and Pranab Mukherjee
Narendra Modi and Pranab Mukherjee
The BJP claimed a shot in the arm claiming that President Pranab Mukherjee has agreed to cut short his visit to Bihar by a day in the wake of its rally in Patna on October 27.

BJP leaders Shahnawaz Hussain and Rajiv Pratap Rudy called on the President at the Rashtrapati Bhavan on Thursday. Even though they called it a "courtesy call", they told reporters after the meeting that he has told them that he would not stay in Bihar on October 26 night, as scheduled originally.

"It was a courtesy call since he is coming to Bihar and our rally is on the 27th. The President is coming to Bihar on October 26 and he has cancelled his night halt. He will return the same day. Now he will arrive at Patna airport and go directly to convocation and return," Hussain said after coming out of the Rashtrapati Bhavan.

"We were concerned that he doesn't have to face any problem due to the BJP rally... It is great that the prime minister-in-waiting is visiting a day after the President," he added.

Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who is also the NDA's prime ministerial candidate, is scheduled to address the Patna rally on October 27.

The BJP had accused the ruling Janata Dal-United of deliberating scheduling the President's visit to Bihar to clash the date with its rally. The JD-U, however, had rubbished the charge saying it had no say in the President's trip plan.

The BJP and the JD-U had snapped ties earlier this year after it became evident that the BJP would declare Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's bete noire Narendra Modi as its prime ministerial candidate.

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

World's 10 safest and unsafest airlines

World's 10 safest and unsafest airlines

 1.Finnair

Finnair Celebrates 85th Anniversary In Milan Finnair has been rated the safest airline in the world, based on the study that monitors plane crashes around the world. 

 

 

 2.New Zealand

New Zealand Prepares ForAir New Zealand has been rated as the world's second safest airline. 

 

 

 

3.Cathay Pacific

Cathay Pacific AirlinesAccording to the report, none of the top nine ranked airlines had lost an aircraft or had a fatality during the 30-year period. Cathay Pacific is ranked at No.3 in terms of safety.

 

4.Emirates Airline

Emirates Launches Daily A380 Flights From Dubai To MunichDubai-based Emirates Airline is ranked at No.4 for safety.

 

 

 

5.Etihad airways

World's 10 safest and unsafest airlinesAnother airline from the United Arab Emirates; Abu Dhabi-based Etihad airways comes in next in the rankings.

 

 

6.EVA Air

World's 10 safest and unsafest airlinesRank 6: EVA Air is an airline based in Taiwan, operating passenger and dedicated cargo services to over 40 international destinations in Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. It is the second largest Taiwanese airline, next in size to its main rival, China Airlines.

7.TAP Portugal

An Airbus jet of TAP Portugal airlines takes off in Lisbon airportRank 7: TAP Portugal, founded 1945 as Transportes AĆ©reos Portugueses, SGPS, S.A., commonly known as TAP, is the national airline of Portugal.

 

8.Hainan Airlines

World's 10 safest and unsafest airlinesRank 8: Hainan Airlines is the largest privately owned air transport company and the fourth largest airline in terms of fleet size in the People's Republic of China. It operates scheduled domestic and international services on 500 routes from Hainan and nine locations on the mainland, as well as charter services.

9.Virgin Australia

Tiger Airways Resumes FlightsRank 9. Virgin Australia: formerly Virgin Blue Airlines, is Australia's second-largest airline as well as the largest by fleet size to use the Virgin brand. Now based in Bowen Hills, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, the airline was co-founded by British businessman Sir Richard Branson and former Virgin Blue CEO Brett Godfrey. It was established in 2000 with two aircraft operating on a single route, and suddenly found itself catapulted to the position of Australia's second airline after the collapse of Ansett Australia in September 2001. The airline has grown to directly serve 29 cities in Australia from hubs in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, using a fleet of narrow-body Boeing and Embraer jets; and Airbus and Boeing widebody jets.

10.British Airways

Activity in Heathrow Airport's Terminal 5British Airways has been ranked as the tenth safest airline in the world.


Opening Brief in Supreme Court Gay Marriage

Opening Brief in Supreme Court Gay Marriage Case


Let the filing of the gay marriage briefs begin! On Tuesday, proponents of Proposition 8 — the controversial California ballot initiative that defines marriage as between a man and a woman — filed their opening briefs with the Supreme Court, urging the justices to reverse a lower court decision that struck down the state’s ban on gay marriage.
Arguments in the case will be heard at the end of March, and briefs from the opponents are due in about a month.
“By adopting Proposition 8,” Charles Cooper, a lawyer for ProtectMarriage.com, writes, “the People of California demonstrated their belief that this matter is best resolved by the People themselves, not by their courts. The Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the People of California — or any State — from making this choice. To the contrary, it leaves them free to do what they are doing — debating this controversial issue and seeking to resolve it in a way that will best serve their families, their children, and, ultimately their society as a whole.”
ProtectMarriage.com, the original sponsor of Prop 8, is defending the law because California’s elected officials refused to do so. The group argues that preserving traditional marriage furthers society’s “existential interests in responsible procreation and childrearing.”
“An animating purpose of marriage is to increase the likelihood that children will be born and raised in stable and enduring family units by their own mothers and fathers,” Cooper writes.”  Because relationships between persons of the same sex do not have the capacity to produce children, they do not implicate this interest in responsible procreation and childrearing in the same way.”
Cooper criticizes a federal appeals court that struck down Prop 8 on narrow grounds tailored closely to California and its history with gay marriage.
For a few months in 2008, gay couples in California were able to obtain marriage licenses after a ruling from the California Supreme Court. Some 18,000 same sex couples obtained marriage licenses in the state before Prop 8 was passed in November 2008.
In February of 2012, a panel of judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Prop 8 “stripped same-sex couples” of the right to use the designation of marriage to describe their relationships and that Prop 8 “serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California and to officially reclassify their relationship and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples.”
In his brief, Cooper points out that there was only a brief period of time in California’s history when same-sex marriage was allowed. He writes, “it is difficult to think of a law with deeper roots in California’s and our Nation’s history, practices, and traditions than one defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. That definition has prevailed for all but 142 days of California’s 162 year history, and it continues to prevail in federal law and in the overwhelming majority of the States, most often through constitutional provisions much like Proposition 8. ”
Cooper makes a veiled reference to the fact that President Obama has only recently come out in support of gay marriage. He writes, “The Ninth Circuit’s charge thus impugns the motives of over seven million California voters and countless other Americans who believe that traditional marriage continues to serve society’s vital interests, including the citizens and lawmakers of 40 other states, the Members of Congress and President who supported enactment of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the large majority of state and federal appellate judges who have addressed the issue, an until very recently President Obama. ”
Cooper points out that prop 8 left “undisturbed” other laws, including domestic partnership laws available to gays and lesbians in the state.

'UN mission in Kashmir can be terminated only by UNSC'

'UN mission in Kashmir can be terminated only by UNSC'

As India and Pakistan clashed in the Security Council over relevance of the UN observer group at the LoC, a spokesperson for UN chief Ban Ki-moon said the force can be terminated only by a decision of the 15-nation body.
The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) was "established in 1948 by the Security Council. The Secretary-General's position has always been that UNMOGIP can only be terminated by a decision of the Security Council," Ban's spokesperson Martin Nesirky said in an email said.
During a UNSC open debate on peacekeeping organised by Pakistan yesterday, India's Permanent Representative to the UN Hardeep Singh Puri had said that UNMOGIP's role had been "overtaken" by the 1972 Simla Agreement, which was signed between India and Pakistan.
Following the Simla pact, the two countries had resolved to settle their differences by "peaceful means through bilateral negotiations," Puri said.
The Indian envoy had also suggested that it would be better to spend the resources allocated for UNMOGIP in other areas or missions to ensure the finances are better utilised elsewhere in times of austerity.
Rejecting any suggestion of winding down the UN mission in Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN Masood Khan said UNMOGIP continues to monitor the ceasefire in accordance with Security Council resolution and its mandate is "therefore fully valid, relevant, and operative".
Khan said no bilateral agreement between the two nations has "overtaken or affected" the role or legality of the observer group adding that "the fact is that both India and Pakistan are hosting UNMOGIP".

Site Search